Jump to content

Gsxr 11 WT vs WP cams


svingel

Recommended Posts

From a dusty corner of my mind, I seem to recall that the cams from the 1100 WT (possibly the WS) onwards gives more bottom and mid range, with the same top end as the WP. It supposedly is worthwhile (along with ignition), to drop in the cams from the later models. Read it somewhere, but forgot where... Anyone got hints/links/?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a dusty corner of my mind, I seem to recall that the cams from the 1100 WT (possibly the WS) onwards gives more bottom and mid range, with the same top end as the WP. It supposedly is worthwhile (along with ignition), to drop in the cams from the later models. Read it somewhere, but forgot where... Anyone got hints/links/?

The WP and WR did lose the low end grunt of the earlier oil cooled engines but was sorted by different cams and ignition settings from WS onwards. Seen it written about a few times on OSS if you want to have a browse OldSkoolSuzuki

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The WP and WR did lose the low end grunt of the earlier oil cooled engines but was sorted by different cams and ignition settings from WS onwards. Seen it written about a few times on OSS if you want to have a browse OldSkoolSuzuki

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The later engines use the Yoshi profile. They're similar to later 750W cams with a wider spacing of the lobes. I think I read the 750w cams can be used but the follwers are just off centre

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for the replies. I e-mailed Kent cams, whether they did a regrind in a profile similar to that, but they only did for top end. I'll keep surfing the 'bay, then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...